
By Troy Brownfield
5.12.03
|

Advance
News Transmission from May, 2004: Survivor: The Amazon
winner Jenna reportedly blew all of her money on a big
sorority formal, after which she's been seen on skid
row, showing her breasts for Reese's Cups. Loser Heidi
said, "I still adore her" before making ugly
face and sobbing uncontrollably.
|
Reality,
Morality, and Bullshit
Consider
this a special report from the cultural front lines. For those
who care about such things, Jenna won Survivor: The Amazon
last night. She won by whining, bitching, and somehow being
lucky enough to win the two most crucial immunity challenges
in the entire game (one of which she pulled out by literal
blind luck, the other win she managed by having bizarrely
long toes and clawlike feet; if you don't believe me, check
the tape). Anyone who has watched this season knows that the
true victor should have, by all rights, been Rob; his lying,
scheming and outright brilliant manipulations truly play to
the principle of "Outplay, Outwit, Outlast". Were
it not for Jenna's fluke victories at the end, Rob was your
boy. However, that's not my issue.
What IS
my issue is how often the words "honesty" and "morality"
came up near the end of the game. CBS's most amazing accomplishment
with Survivor seems not to be the ratings or the money, but
the fact that they constantly keep getting these starry-eyed
idiots to play the game who think that there's some notion
of fair. The whole fabric of the game is the concept of surviving
to the end. If it was all about physicality or intellect,
there would be no social interaction. The creators WANT there
to be competition, backstabbing, and deceit; in fact, that's
what makes it fun. If I want to see skilled people compete
in mental or physical disciplines, I'd watch "Jeopardy!"
or basketball.
The attraction
of Survivor is a) Americans like game shows, b) they often
have attractive people in exotic places, and c) someone is
going to fuck someone over. I'll admit it; I watch for C,
and I most often HATE so-called reality TV. I could give a
crap about blow-job-queen Monica Lewinsky and her fetish masked
army of bachelors. I don't waste time on American Idol past
the first two episodes (I only watch the early installments
to see the awful singers get ridiculed; stay past that, and
you're only seeing which cookie-cutter pop wannabe is chosen
to sing the next tinny, tacky jingle that permeates our already
bought-and-paid-for radio air waves). I watched the end of
"Joe Millionaire" just to see if the chick who'd
been lied to freaked out. Essentially, I guess I just enjoy
seeing what game show contestants are willing to do in a social
setting for money (which I why I dislike Fear Factor; outside
of so-lame-it's-crippled trash talk, there's no social context).
But to
keep mentioning morality over and over: give me a break. Even
if you claim to not have watched the five previous installments,
you know that going to compete for a million dollars automatically
takes you out of the altruism sweepstakes. This is no morality
in competing for money: that's not a judgement; it's the simple
truth. There is nothing WRONG with competing for money; it
just has nothing to do with morality. Kids, let's go to Webster's!
(Source:Dictionary.com
and Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998
MICRA, Inc.)
morality
\Mo*ral"i*ty\, n.; pl. Moralities. [L. moralitas: cf. F. moralit['e].]
1. The relation of conformity or nonconformity to the moral
standard or rule; quality of an intention, a character, an
action, a principle, or a sentiment, when tried by the standard
of right. The morality of an action is founded in the freedom
of that principle, by virtue of which it is in the agent's
power, having all things ready and requisite to the performance
of an action, either to perform or not perform it. --South.
2. The quality of an action which renders it good; the conformity
of an act to the accepted standard of right. Of moralitee
he was the flower. --Chaucer. I am bold to think that morality
is capable of demonstration. --Locke.
3. The doctrines or rules of moral duties, or the duties of
men in their social character; ethics. The end of morality
is to procure the affections to obey reason, and not to invade
it. --Bacon. The system of morality to be gathered out of
. . . ancient sages falls very short of that delivered in
the gospel. --Swift.
4. The practice of the moral duties; rectitude of life; conformity
to the standard of right; virtue; as, we often admire the
politeness of men whose morality we question.
5. A kind of allegorical play, so termed because it consisted
of discourses in praise of morality between actors representing
such characters as Charity, Faith, Death, Vice, etc. Such
plays were occasionally exhibited as late as the reign of
Henry VIII. --Strutt.
6. Intent; meaning; moral. [Obs.] Taketh the morality thereof,
good men. --Chaucer.
To break
it down, everything is relative. There is no absolute morality,
except that perhaps the idea of killing is wrong. Outside
of the confines of the game, I'd say that lying is wrong too.
HOWEVER, if you've watched Survivor before, you'd know that
lying is an intrinsic part of the game. Therefore, owing to
the STANDARD of the game, lying is NOT immoral. Also, considering
that basically every player lied at one point or another,
the convention of morality within the game therefore BECOMES
the fact that lying to win in Survivor, is indeed, according
to the standard of conduct, therefore moral.
Apply
this then to our day-to-day. Self-appointed "moral watchdog"
groups from the idiot Parent's Television Council to the American
Family Association cry foul on anything that THEY don't agree
with. As our American culture is constituted by a variety
of cultures and religions, each with different ideals, I then
posit that America doesn't have a true set of morals at all,
because no one agrees on the standards. One could argue that
our laws are the standard, but the laws govern behavior, not
belief. In fact, first among our rights is the First Amendment,
which guarantees us freedom of belief. Therefore, our moral
character as a country is formed initially by the tacit acknowledgement
that we may have different beliefs, and therefore, different
views of morality.
For example,
Jenna and Heidi whined that Rob was immoral for lying. Yet,
both dropped top and trou for candy. Would Rob get arrested
on the street in Ohio for lying? No. Would Jenna and Heidi
get arrested for getting bare-ass naked on the street in Ohio?
Yep. So what's the real morality? If the girls agree that
morality is defined by game and location, then isn't Rob's
lying morally acceptable given the climate created by the
five previous shows? You lie to win, and that's accepted.
Therefore, there is no moral trespass.
Application
of Principle
Let's
try another case, which has been discussed by my pal Jen Contino
at Comicon.com.
The American Family Association, led by the Reverend Wildmon
(who, in my opinion is a first-class whacko; I've mentioned
him before in my column) is pitching a bitch because of money
raised at the Pittsburgh Comicon. The Pitt gave money to the
wonderful Make-A-Wish Foundation, which does great things
for kids battling illness. The AFA, a group that doesn't run
Make-A-Wish, is complaining because some of the fundraiser
cash was raised by Playboy models who did signings at the
Comicon. WOW folks; don't look too long at the AFA, lest their
righteousness burn out your retinas.
The AFA
and their ilk have bombed the Pennsylvania branch of Make-A-Wish
with over 15,000 emails complaining that they took money from
the Comicon. Let me point out that only 8,000 people or so
actually went. The Playboy models were fully clothed. They
signed magazines. Other booths were for comics, toys, anime
and more. The AFA's Diane Gramley actually said to the Pittsburgh
Post-Gazette, '"How can families trust an organization that
readily accepts money that has been gleaned from a porn-laden
event?"
Doesn't
that seem like an EXTREME case of moral judgment to you? On
one hand, you have hot women who get naked for money, but
help donate said money to help sick little kids. On the other
hand, you have a group that regularly protests anything they
don't like attacking the foundation that helps sick little
kids instead of offering their own alternatives or money.
What seems like the moral thing to you? Even conceding that
displayed nudity is a problem for some Americans, it takes
us back to the thought that it IS NOT a problem for others.
Did I mention that the AFA defended Rick Santorum, and alleges
that 70% of all porn falls into children's hands without offering
proof? Again, there is not a consensus on morality.
What
It Means to You
So, you
may wonder how TV and Comicons actually affect you. Well,
if you aren't a fan of either, I guess they don't. However,
the whole moral issue raises its head in the country over
and over. As long as there is freedom of religion and press
and speech in America, there will never be a moral consensus.
That's the way that it should be. All of our laws are compromises,
and all of our laws are mutable. The Constitution itself,
a brilliant invention, is left open to change.
I guess
my column is a cautionary one. Don't assume that everyone
has the same morals as you. Don't let a group or a politician
tell you what is right or moral. Listen to your head, your
heart, and your gut. In this age of paranoia and swiftly made
laws and deteriorating freedoms, it's best to speak now and
remind others that there are other opinions. You may get shouted
down, and you may have to compromise; that's true. However,
you don't ever have to let someone else tell you what to think,
what to do, and what is or isn't moral for yourself and your
children. That's also true, and, if I may say so, self-evident.

Troy Brownfield is the Editor-in-Chief of Shotgun Reviews.
Email Troy at psikotyk@aol.com
|