The 2001 Academy Awards or I Hate Gladiator
By Neil Wright

It is a shame that only years after the votes have been cast do we realize what movie was really the best film of the year. Twenty years down the road no one will remember that Gladiator won the Best Picture Academy Award. People will wonder why a joyous entertainment that presented the limitless possibilities of the imagination did not win the coveted golden statue. Instead of honoring Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, a third-rate action film took the ultimate prize and succeeded in confirming my belief that most of the voters for Best Picture think that if a movie looks and acts enough like an epic it must be so. It also proves that the Academy only likes war movies that feature men in kilts or leather skirts. If it takes place during World War II, a film will lose to a movie about the Bard trying to get laid, but if the war movie has lots of clanging swords or decapitations of nasty barbarians it is a shoo-in for Best Picture. This is good news for The Rock, who may very well be the next Conan the Barbarian.

The 2001 Academy Awards, presented on March 25th, was a travesty of volume and violence over imagination and grace. Sure, there was no single movie that completely swept the ceremony; Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and Traffic both walked away with four awards each while Gladiator took five categories. That Gladiator won anything, besides an award for its costume design, is cause for shame. It is hard to imagine that anyone years from now will look upon this movie with fondness and say, "Wow, that was one of the best movies ever made." I will go out on a limb here and say that Gladiator did not distinguish itself as either a good gladiator film or even a good movie for that matter. It was a soulless and dismal exercise of sound and fury. It may very well be the worst movie to ever take home the Best Picture Oscar. Of course, there is The Sound of Music to consider as a close second with The Greatest Show on Earth not far behind. At least those films had colors other than browns and grays on their palettes.

What is it that bothers me the most about Gladiator? Was it the cut and paste screenplay for which three writers received credit that seems like something Vince McMahon would put together for his wrestling mutants on TNN? Perhaps it was the deliberately jerky editing and camerawork that director Ridley Scott used throughout the film to give a false sense of urgency to the battle scenes that only confuse the viewer. Or maybe it was the Cimmerian cinematography that showed the "glory" of Rome in drab, muddy colors. No wait, I know what it is: the absolutely wretched special effects (masked by the overcast cinematography) that look so transparently fake that I expected toasters with wings to fly in the background. These were screen saver special effects that only helped show the flaws in the tapestry of Gladiator. This was one movie where I couldn't go home and say, "Well at least the special effects were good." They were certainly not the equal of the astonishing visuals presented in The Perfect Storm or Hollow Man which featured the worst storm in recorded history and a man disappearing layer by agonizing layer respectively. The Perfect Storm's relentless 100-foot waves were utterly convincing and tied me in knots despite my knowledge of how the story would end, and Hollow Man's special effects were endlessly inventive even when the story was not. How could these films lose to speeded-up combat that would embarrass Steven Seagal and shots of digital tigers rejected from Jumanji?

Even though the Academy seldom gets it right as far what really deserves Best Picture, I have always enjoyed watching the Academy Awards. I know in my heart that whichever movie wins is really about politics and who has the biggest campaign fund. I know a system has to be flawed when Citizen Kane does not win Best Picture and when Martin Scorsese has yet to receive proper credit for his directing mastery. And yet, year after year, I keep returning if only to witness a moment when an artist or film is honored and gets what is deserved. Most of the time I walk away disappointed and baffled by the films that win. What kind of a year was it when only two four star movies (Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and Traffic) are nominated for Best Picture while two other marginal movies (Erin Brockovich and Chocolat) and one terrible film got the same opportunity for the prize? The same one that allowed George W. Bush to take the White House I suppose. Now Gladiator's win has been explained.

For those who enjoyed Gladiator, I shall follow the lessons proffered by the movie and watch some of the fallen movies from the past that deserve more attention and perhaps should retroactively be awarded the Best Picture Oscar. Some of these include Citizen Kane, Saving Private Ryan, Star Wars, The Shawshank Redemption, Goodfellas, and soon Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. These films have strength and honor, and we shall honor them. Ooooooh, powerful dialogue. I should be a shoo-in next year.

Back to the Feature Forum



shotgun reviews
| the big question | review rack | feature forum | rasslin' ring | comics convention | shotgun press | contact | links
home | masthead | sponsors | email: psikotyk@aol.com
© 2001 Shotgun Reviews - All rights reserved.